Three programmes for colleges

Accreditation and rankings ask you to evidence environmental practice and to show students taking part in it. These produce both — and your students do the measuring, so the participation record writes itself.

Talk to us

Desk-based · ₹40k–₹75k

NIRF SDG submission

We read the current manual, tell you what your institution can actually evidence, and assemble the submission with a source under every figure. The gap list comes first.

Two days on site · from ₹45,000

Campus baseline

Twenty of your students measure energy, water, waste and green cover. You get a report where every figure has a source, ten costed fixes ranked by payback, and a participation record.

Six weeks · ₹1,600 per team

Sustainability hackathon

Undergraduate teams of two to four build something that works somewhere real, in water, energy, waste or biomimicry. 30% of entry fees after GST comes back as prize money.

For funders and sponsors

Fund a few hundred people who each built something

Not a headcount. Every team in the hackathon has to build something that works and produce the measurements for it, so at the end you get an account of what was actually made and what it changed — with the working attached.

Sponsors have no say in scoring or results. That's in the agreement, and we'd rather say it here too.

Start a conversation

Hackathon title sponsorship

₹3–8 lakh

Naming, a named category prize, and a report covering every team, college and measured result.

Underwrite free entries

Any amount

Cover entry for teams from government and under-resourced colleges. Judging is on evidence, not polish, so the comparison is genuinely level.

Not sure which one fits?

Tell us the college, who's asking you for the evidence, and the deadline you're working to. We'll say which fits — and if none of them does, we'll say that too.